Dennis Givens v. Scott Smith
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999166231-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00145-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999265195]. Mailed to: Dennis Givens. [13-1928]
Appeal: 13-1928
Doc: 29
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1928
DENNIS A. GIVENS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SCOTT R. SMITH, individually and collectively; KEITH C.
GAMBLE, individually and collectively; STEPHEN M. FOWLER,
individually and collectively; D. LUKE FURBEE, individually
and collectively; OFFICER S. A. ZIMMERMAN, individually and
collectively;
OFFICER
J.
E.
DEAN,
individually
and
collectively;
J.
C.
WEAVER,
a/k/a
Jack
C.
Weaver,
individually and collectively; HONORABLE JAMES P. MAZZONE,
individually and collectively; HONORABLE ARTHUR M. RECHT,
individually and collectively; HONORABLE RONALD E. WILSON,
individually
and
collectively;
KENNETH
W.
BLAKE,
individually and collectively,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00145-FPS-JES)
Submitted:
December 19, 2013
Decided:
December 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis A. Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Diane G. Senakievich, David
Lee Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia;
Appeal: 13-1928
Doc: 29
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
Kenneth Louis Hopper, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE,
PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Deva A. Solomon, Monte Lee
Williams, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia;
John Michael Hedges, Teresa Jean Lyons, HEDGES LYONS & SHEPHERD,
Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 13-1928
Doc: 29
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Dennis A. Givens seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate
judge.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
54(b); Cohen
v.
545-46 (1949).
28
U.S.C.
Beneficial
§ 1292
Indus.
(2006);
Loan
Fed.
Corp.,
337
R.
Civ.
U.S.
P.
541,
The order Givens seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny Givens’ motion for a transcript and dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?