Isidoro Rodriguez v. Commissioner, IRS

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to vacate [999165767-2]; denying Motion to disqualify/recuse judge [999165757-2] Originating case number: 10691-09 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999282155]. Mailed to: appellants. [13-1966]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1966 Doc: 24 Filed: 01/23/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1966 ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ; IRENE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioners - Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 10691-09) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isidoro Rodriguez, Irene Rodriguez, Appellants Pro Se. Robert William Metzler, Teresa Thomas Milton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1966 Doc: 24 Filed: 01/23/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Isidoro Rodriguez and Irene Rodriguez appeal the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s assessment of additional taxes and penalty with respect to their 2006 federal income tax liability. reversible error. by the tax We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. Rodriguez v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue Serv., Tax Ct. No. 10691-09 (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 13, 2013). We deny the Rodriguez’ motion to recuse the judges of this court as well as their motion to vacate the judgment below. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?