Antwan Sen El v. Rachel Fleming
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:13-cv-00446-CMC-PJG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999275978]. Mailed to: Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El. [13-1992]
Appeal: 13-1992
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/13/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1992
ANTWAN EUGENE FORD SEN EL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RACHEL
Judge,
ANN
FESTA
FLEMING,
Judge;
HERMAN
MELVIN
HOWELL,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CLOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHILLIP HAWKINS, #311;
FORD, #304; SGT. CALDWELL, #319; SELESTINO, #305,
C.
B.
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (0:13-cv-00446-CMC-PJG)
Submitted:
December 17, 2013
Decided:
January 13, 2014
Before KING, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1992
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/13/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El seeks to appeal the district
court’s
order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge and dismissing Defendants Judge Fleming and Judge Howell
without prejudice from this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006).
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
54(b); Cohen
v.
545-46 (1949).
28
U.S.C.
Beneficial
§ 1292
Indus.
(2012);
Loan
Fed.
Corp.,
337
R.
Civ.
U.S.
P.
541,
The order Sen El seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?