Peggy Coleman v. Cedar Coal Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 12-0298-BLA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999304392]. Mailed to: Coleman. [13-2072]

Appeal: 13-2072

Doc: 18

Filed: 02/26/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2072

PEGGY LUE COLEMAN (Widow of EVERETT DEAN COLEMAN),
Petitioner,
v.
CEDAR
COAL
COMPANY;
DIRECTOR,
OFFICE
OF
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(12-0298-BLA)

Submitted:

February 18, 2014

Decided:

February 26, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peggy Lue Coleman, Petitioner Pro Se.
Mark Joseph Grigoraci,
David Y. Yaussey, ROBINSON & MCELWEE, PLLC, Charleston, West
Virginia; Sarah Marie Hurley, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2072

Doc: 18

Filed: 02/26/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Peggy

Coleman

Board’s

decision

judge’s

denial

and

of

§§ 901-945 (2012).
Board’s

decision

seeks

order

black

review

of

affirming

lung

the

the

benefits

Benefits

Review

administrative

pursuant

to

30

law

U.S.C.

Our review of the record discloses that the
is

based

without reversible error.

upon

substantial

evidence

and

is

Accordingly, we deny the petition for

review for the reasons stated by the Board.

Coleman v. Cedar

Coal Co., No. 12-0298-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 27, 2013; July 18, 2013).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2