Stephen Canterbury v. J.P. Morgan Mortgage

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00059-NKM-BWC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999323014].. [13-2083]

Appeal: 13-2083

Doc: 37

Filed: 03/26/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2083

STEPHEN J. CANTERBURY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
GMAC
MORTGAGE
Corporation,

CORPORATION

LLC,

d/b/a

GMAC

Mortgage

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00059-NKM-BWC)

Submitted:

March 13, 2014

Before NIEMEYER
Circuit Judge.

and

KING,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

March 26, 2014

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry W. McLaughlin, III, LAW OFFICE OF HENRY MCLAUGHLIN, P.C.,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jason C. Hicks, WOMBLE
CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Appeal: 13-2083

Doc: 37

Filed: 03/26/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-2083

Doc: 37

Filed: 03/26/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

J.

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Stephen

Canterbury

the

district

court’s

order dismissing his complaint seeking a declaratory judgment
that he validly exercised his right to rescission of a refinance
credit transaction under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15
U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667f (2012), seeking enforcement of rescission,
and seeking alteration of the timing of tender under TILA.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

We

error.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3