Sonya Pettaway v. Department of Education
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999188204-2]. Originating case numbers: 3:13-cv-00241-HEH,11-36507-DOT,11-03285-DOT. Copies to all parties and the district and bankruptcy court/agency. [999326146]. Mailed to: Sonya Pettaway. [13-2104]
Appeal: 13-2104
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2104
SONYA D. PETTAWAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:13-cv-00241-HEH)
Submitted:
March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit
Circuit Judges.
Judge,
Decided:
and
HAMILTON
and
March 31, 2014
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sonya D. Pettaway, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Acting
United
States
Attorney,
Alexandria,
Virginia;
Robert
P.
McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2104
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sonya
Pettaway
appeals
from
the
district
court’s
orders upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that her
student loan debt was not dischargeable in her bankruptcy case,
and denying her motion to amend the record.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we grant
Pettaway’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
court.
Pettaway v. Dep’t of Educ., No. 3:13-cv-00241-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug.
9, 2013; Oct. 11, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?