In re: Jay L. Thoma

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999192243-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999199911-2]; denying Motion for temporary relief [999195357-2]. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02167-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999246534]. Mailed to: Jay Thomas. [13-2126]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2126 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/25/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2126 In re: JAY L. THOMAS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:13-cv-02167-DKC) Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay Thomas, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-2126 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/25/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jay L. Thomas petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his habeas petition. He seeks an directing the district court to act. court’s docket prejudice reveals Thomas’ that habeas the order this court Our review of the district court petition. from has dismissed Accordingly, without because the district court has recently decided Thomas’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We also grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Thomas’ motion for temporary relief. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?