In re: Jay L. Thoma
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999192243-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999199911-2]; denying Motion for temporary relief [999195357-2]. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02167-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999246534]. Mailed to: Jay Thomas. [13-2126]
Appeal: 13-2126
Doc: 13
Filed: 11/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2126
In re:
JAY L. THOMAS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(8:13-cv-02167-DKC)
Submitted:
November 21, 2013
Decided:
November 25, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Thomas, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2126
Doc: 13
Filed: 11/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jay
L.
Thomas
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his
habeas
petition.
He
seeks
an
directing the district court to act.
court’s
docket
prejudice
reveals
Thomas’
that
habeas
the
order
this
court
Our review of the district
court
petition.
from
has
dismissed
Accordingly,
without
because
the
district court has recently decided Thomas’ case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot.
We also grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and deny Thomas’ motion for temporary relief.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?