Ronald Satish Emrit v. Office Depot, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02297-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999246517]. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit. [13-2141]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2141 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/25/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2141 RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:13-cv-02297-RWT) Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-2141 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/25/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit seeks to appeal the district court order requiring Emrit to particularize his employment discrimination complaint by providing a copy of a right to sue letter. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). order The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a final nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?