Ronald Satish Emrit v. Office Depot, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02297-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999246517]. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit. [13-2141]
Appeal: 13-2141
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2141
RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-02297-RWT)
Submitted:
November 21, 2013
Decided:
November 25, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2141
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit seeks to appeal the district court
order
requiring
Emrit
to
particularize
his
employment
discrimination complaint by providing a copy of a right to sue
letter.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2006);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
order
The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a final
nor
an
appealable
interlocutory
or
collateral
order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?