Charles Green v. Deputy Sheriff Tom Hodge

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999327570-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999268702-2]; denying Motion to compel [999249863-2] Originating case number: 3:10-cv-03162-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999387969]. Mailed to: Charles Green. [13-2143]

Appeal: 13-2143

Doc: 46

Filed: 07/02/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2143

CHARLES GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY SHERIFF TOM HODGES,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF LEON LOTT,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:10-cv-03162-JFA)

Submitted:

June 26, 2014

Decided:

July 2, 2014

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON &
LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2143

Doc: 46

Filed: 07/02/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles Green appeals a jury verdict denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.

We have reviewed the

record, including the transcript of the two-day jury trial, and
find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm.

Green v.

Deputy Tom Hodges, No. 3:10-cv-03162-JFA (D.S.C. filed Aug. 27,
2013;

entered

motions

for

appointment of counsel and to compel disclosure of evidence.

We

dispense

Aug.

with

contentions

are

oral

28,

2013).

argument

adequately

We

deny

because

presented

in

Green’s

the
the

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2