Leo Payne v. S. Sengel
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999205898-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00852-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999264945].. [13-2151]
Appeal: 13-2151
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2151
LEO L. PAYNE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
S. RANDOLPH SENGEL, Chief Commonwealth Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia; STEVEN ESCOBAR, Police Officer, Alexandria Police
Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00852-JRS)
Submitted:
December 19, 2013
Decided:
December 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leo Lionel Payne, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2151
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Leo Lionel Payne appeals the district court’s order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly,
we
deny
leave
to
proceed
in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the
district
(E.D.
Va.
court.
Sept.
4,
Payne
2013).
v.
We
Sengel,
No.
dispense
3:12-cv-00852-JRS
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?