Michael Faas v. Mary Scott
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00383-F,AP: 10-00101-8-ATS,BK: 10-00794-8-SWH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999328342].. [13-2181]
Appeal: 13-2181
Doc: 28
Filed: 04/02/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2181
METROPOLITAN
HEALTH
CORPORATION,
Hospital; MICHAEL FAAS,
d/b/a
Metropolitan
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
MARY TERESA SCOTT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge.
(5:12-cv-00383-F; 10-00101-8-ATS; 10-00794-8SWH)
Submitted:
March 31, 2014
Decided:
April 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph S. Dowdy, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Edward L. Embree, III,
MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
Luis M. Lluberas, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLC, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2181
Doc: 28
Filed: 04/02/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mary
Scott
sued
her
former
employer,
Metropolitan
Hospital Corp., and its CEO and President Michael Faas, alleging
retaliatory
(2012).
discharge
in
violation
of
31
U.S.C.
§
3730(h)
The district court for the Western District of Michigan
entered
summary
judgment
in
Metropolitan
$1,652,235.20
for
proceedings.
Scott filed a Chapter 7 petition; Metropolitan
filed
the
underlying
adversary
the
during
total
and
sanctioned
conduct
in
of
subsequently
her
Scott
favor
the
proceeding
amount
course
asserting
of
of
those
that
the
sanctions award in its favor was nondischargeable as a willful
and malicious injury under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) (2012).
The
bankruptcy court agreed with Metropolitan; the district court
affirmed.
We have reviewed the record included in this appeal,
as well as the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order affirming the
bankruptcy court’s orders awarding summary judgment in favor of
Metropolitan.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?