Pensicola Banks v. John McHugh
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00032-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999319206]. Mailed to: Pensicola Banks. [13-2188]
Appeal: 13-2188
Doc: 8
Filed: 03/20/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2188
PENSICOLA BANKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary, Department of the Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00032-JFA)
Submitted:
February 19, 2014
Before WYNN and
Circuit Judge.
DIAZ,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
March 20, 2014
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pensicola Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Terri Hearn Bailey,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2188
Doc: 8
Filed: 03/20/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Pensicola
accepting
the
Banks
appeals
recommendation
of
the
district
the
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
granting the Defendant summary judgment in Banks’s civil action.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
See Banks v. McHugh, No. 3:12-cv-00032-JFA (D.S.C. Aug.
23, 2013).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?