Pensicola Banks v. John McHugh

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00032-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999319206]. Mailed to: Pensicola Banks. [13-2188]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2188 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/20/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2188 PENSICOLA BANKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary, Department of the Army, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00032-JFA) Submitted: February 19, 2014 Before WYNN and Circuit Judge. DIAZ, Circuit Decided: Judges, and March 20, 2014 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pensicola Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-2188 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/20/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Pensicola accepting the Banks appeals recommendation of the district the court’s magistrate order judge and granting the Defendant summary judgment in Banks’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. McHugh, No. 3:12-cv-00032-JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2013). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?