Sandra Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00724-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999317494]. Mailed to: Sandra Barcus. [13-2201]

Appeal: 13-2201

Doc: 11

Filed: 03/18/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2201

SANDRA LEE BARCUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-00724-CCB)

Submitted:

February 27, 2014

Decided:

March 18, 2014

Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra Lee Barcus, Appellant Pro Se.
PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Amy Bess, VEDDER PRICE,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2201

Doc: 11

Filed: 03/18/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Sandra Lee Barcus appeals the district court’s order
granting Sears, Roebuck & Co.’s motion for summary judgment on
her claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment, in violation of 42
U.S.C.

§

2000e.

reversible error.

We

have

reviewed

the

find

for

leave

to

amend

Additionally, we deny
her

additional employment discrimination claims.

complaint

to

add

See Cozzarelli v.

Inspire Pharm., Inc., 549 F.3d 618, 630-31 (4th Cir. 2008).
dispense

with

contentions

are

no

Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., No.

1:12-cv-00724-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2013).
request

and

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Barcus’

record

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2