Orlando Brown v. Richland County Sheriff's Dept
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-03062-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999284561]. Mailed to: Orlando Brown. [13-2224]
Appeal: 13-2224
Doc: 8
Filed: 01/27/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2224
ORLANDO BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-03062-MBS)
Submitted:
January 23, 2014
Decided:
January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, Andrew
Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2224
Doc: 8
Filed: 01/27/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Orlando
Brown
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
We
have
Accordingly,
district
court.
Brown v. Richland Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 3:12-cv-03062-MBS
(D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?