In re: Kelvin Spott
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999255086-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999219318-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999209033-2] Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00047-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999288171]. Mailed to: K. Spotts. [13-2226]
Appeal: 13-2226
Doc: 10
Filed: 01/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2226
In Re:
KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, a/k/a Shorty,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:98-cr-00047-1)
Submitted:
January 27, 2014
Decided:
January 31, 2014
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin Andre Spotts, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2226
Doc: 10
Filed: 01/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin Andre Spotts petitions for a writ of mandamus,
seeking an order from this court directing the district court to
act on his motions for reconsideration of the district court’s
order denying his motion to reopen his initial 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2012) proceedings in light of United States v. Fisher, 711 F.3d
460 (4th Cir. 2013).
reveals
that
the
reconsideration.
Our review of the district court’s docket
district
court
has
denied
the
motions
for
Accordingly, because the district court has
recently acted on Spotts’ motions, we deny the mandamus petition
as moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Spotts’
motion to remove stay of mandate and amendment to petition for
rehearing and/or rehearing en banc is denied.
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?