Anita Thomas v. Cumberland County Brd of Ed

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-00552-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999307597]. Mailed to: Anita Thomas. [13-2240]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2240 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/04/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2240 ANITA THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BOARD OF EDUCATION; VANSTORY HILLS Defendants - Appellees, and BETTY MUSSLEWHITE; KAREN KOONCE; LYNN GLASS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00552-FL) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anita Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Yager Jenkins, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 13-2240 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/04/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 13-2240 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/04/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Anita Thomas appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her civil action alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. have reviewed the record and find Thomas v. Cumberland Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 5:10-cv-00552-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2013; Oct. 9, 2013). dispense with contentions are oral no argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?