Jay Thomas v. Sallie Mae
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02478-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999307618]. Mailed to: Jay Thomas. [13-2267]
Appeal: 13-2267
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/04/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2267
JAY L. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SALLIE MAE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:13-cv-02478-DKC)
Submitted:
February 27, 2014
Decided:
March 4, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2267
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/04/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jay
L.
Thomas
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing without prejudice his complaint against Sallie Mae
Financial
Corporation,
Inc.,
in
which
he
alleged
breach
of
contract and violations of the Rehabilitation Act and Consumer
Fraud Act.
raised
in
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
the
Appellant’s
brief.
See
4th
Cir.
R.
34(b).
Because Thomas’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Thomas has forfeited appellate
review
district
of
the
court’s
court’s
order.
judgment.
Accordingly,
We
dispense
with
we
affirm
oral
the
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?