Jay Thomas v. Sallie Mae

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02478-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999307618]. Mailed to: Jay Thomas. [13-2267]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2267 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/04/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2267 JAY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SALLIE MAE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:13-cv-02478-DKC) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-2267 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/04/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jay L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint against Sallie Mae Financial Corporation, Inc., in which he alleged breach of contract and violations of the Rehabilitation Act and Consumer Fraud Act. raised in On appeal, we confine our review to the issues the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Thomas’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Thomas has forfeited appellate review district of the court’s court’s order. judgment. Accordingly, We dispense with we affirm oral the argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?