Steven Hinson v. Columbia, City of
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-01032-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326262]. Mailed to: Steven Hinson. [13-2292]
Appeal: 13-2292
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2292
STEVEN L. HINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COLUMBIA, CITY OF,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-01032-MBS)
Submitted:
March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit
Circuit Judges.
Judge,
Decided: March 31, 2014
and
HAMILTON
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven L. Hinson, Appellant Pro Se. William Allen Nickles, III,
NICKLES LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2292
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Steven
Hinson
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Columbia in
his action alleging claims for failure to rehire and failure to
accommodate pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Hinson v. Columbia, No. 3:12-cv-01032-MBS (D.S.C. filed
Sept. 24, 2013; entered Sept. 25, 2013).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?