Steven Hinson v. Columbia, City of

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-01032-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326262]. Mailed to: Steven Hinson. [13-2292]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2292 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2292 STEVEN L. HINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLUMBIA, CITY OF, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-01032-MBS) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: March 31, 2014 and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven L. Hinson, Appellant Pro Se. William Allen Nickles, III, NICKLES LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-2292 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Steven Hinson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Columbia in his action alleging claims for failure to rehire and failure to accommodate pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinson v. Columbia, No. 3:12-cv-01032-MBS (D.S.C. filed Sept. 24, 2013; entered Sept. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?