Chong Su Yi v. Fox Valley Motor

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999265996-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct caption [999254784-2]. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-01064-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326175]. Mailed to: Chong Yi. [13-2315]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2315 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2315 CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FOX VALLEY MOTORS; LOTUS OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, of Maryland; SECRETARY OF STATE, Department of Motor Vehicles of Illinois; NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTRY, NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration); STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01064-PWG) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: March 31, 2014 and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-2315 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chong dismissing his Su Yi civil appeals complaint the district without court’s prejudice. order We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Fox Valley Motors, No. 8:13-cv-01064-PWG (D. Md. Aug. 20, 2013). deny Yi’s motion to amend the caption. the We We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?