Chong Su Yi v. Fox Valley Motor
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999265996-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct caption [999254784-2]. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-01064-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326175]. Mailed to: Chong Yi. [13-2315]
Appeal: 13-2315
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2315
CHONG SU YI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FOX VALLEY MOTORS; LOTUS OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR
VEHICLES, of Maryland; SECRETARY OF STATE, Department of
Motor Vehicles of Illinois; NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTRY, NHTSA
(National Highway Traffic Safety Administration); STATE OF
ILLINOIS; STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-01064-PWG)
Submitted:
March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit
Circuit Judges.
Judge,
Decided: March 31, 2014
and
HAMILTON
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2315
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Chong
dismissing
his
Su
Yi
civil
appeals
complaint
the
district
without
court’s
prejudice.
order
We
have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly,
we
dismiss
deny
leave
to
proceed
in
forma
pauperis
and
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Yi v. Fox
Valley Motors, No. 8:13-cv-01064-PWG (D. Md. Aug. 20, 2013).
deny Yi’s motion to amend the caption.
the
We
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?