Daniel Orr v. North Carolina Dept of Health

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00671-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999264926]. Mailed to: Daniel Orr. [13-2322]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2322 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/23/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2322 DANIEL WAYNE ORR; F. A. O., a minor; L. D. O., a minor, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse; WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Adult Protective Services; RAMON RAJONO, Director of Adult Protective Services; CRAIG BURRIS, Director of Senior Services; GLENDA REED, Elderly Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00671-D) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Wayne Orr, Appellant Pro Se. Roger A. Askew, WAKE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-2322 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/23/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Wayne Orr and two minor Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Orr v. N.C. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 5:13-cv-00671-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?