Daniel Orr v. North Carolina Dept of Health
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00671-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999264926]. Mailed to: Daniel Orr. [13-2322]
Appeal: 13-2322
Doc: 8
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2322
DANIEL WAYNE ORR; F. A. O., a minor; L. D. O., a minor,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES,
Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse; WAKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Adult Protective Services;
RAMON RAJONO, Director of Adult Protective Services; CRAIG
BURRIS, Director of Senior Services; GLENDA REED, Elderly
Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00671-D)
Submitted:
December 19, 2013
Decided:
December 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Wayne Orr, Appellant Pro Se. Roger A. Askew, WAKE COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2322
Doc: 8
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Wayne Orr and two minor Appellants appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2006).
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Orr v. N.C. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No.
5:13-cv-00671-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2013).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?