Derek Jarvis v. The Paper Source

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01454-CMH-TRJ. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999303107]. Mailed to: Derek Jarvis. [13-2368]

Appeal: 13-2368

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/25/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2368

DEREK N. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE PAPER SOURCE,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01454-CMH-TRJ)

Submitted:

February 20, 2014

Decided:

February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Joseph Flaherty, Joon
Hwang, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2368

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/25/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Derek
dismissing

N.

his

Jarvis

appeals

civil

the

complaint

district

court’s

alleging

order

employment

discrimination because he failed to serve Defendant within 120
days of filing his complaint, in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P.
4(m).

We find no abuse of discretion by the district court for

dismissing the complaint under Rule 4(m).

See Shao v. Link

Cargo

(4th

(Taiwan)

Ltd.,

986

(providing review standard).

F.2d

700,

708

Cir.

1993)

Finding no reversible error, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Jarvis v.

The Paper Source, No. 1:12-cv-01454-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. Oct. 28,
2013).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2