James Reedom v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999256358-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02305-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326399]. Mailed to: James Reedom. [13-2423]
Appeal: 13-2423
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2423
JAMES PATRICK REEDOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN
W.
COLVIN,
Administration,
Acting
Commissioner
Social
Security
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02305-RDB)
Submitted:
March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit
Circuit Judges.
Judge,
Decided: March 31, 2014
and
HAMILTON
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Patrick Reedom, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Craig Ormson,
SOCIAL
SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Baltimore,
Maryland,
for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2423
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James
Patrick
Reedom
appeals
the
district
court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reversible
error.
we
grant
leave
to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.
Reedom v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-02305-RDB (D.
Md. Nov. 1, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?