Sheri Daniel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00612-GBL-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999353238]. Mailed to: Sheri Daniel. [13-2426]

Appeal: 13-2426

Doc: 33

Filed: 05/09/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2426

SHERI DANIEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA, NA; U.S. BANK,
N.A., As SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
(SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK N.A.) As TRUSTEE FOR
MORGAN STANLEY MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-11.; BWW LAW GROUP,
LLC; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; GEMINI TITLE & ESCROW, LLC, d/b/a
Gemini Title Reo, LLC, d/b/a Parker, Simon, Kokolis, LLC;
TUTT, TAYLOR & RANKIN, LLC, d/b/a Sotheby’s International
Realty, LLC, Jeremy Browne, Salesperson/Realtor; FAHMEY
ABDELATEY,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00612-GBL-IDD)

Submitted:

April 29, 2014

Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.

DIAZ,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

May 9, 2014

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sheri
Daniel,
Appellant
Pro
Se.
Amy
Sanborn
Owen,
BRIGLIAHUNDLEY, PC, Fairfax, Virginia; Thomas Jonathan Kokolis,
PARKER SIMON & KOKOLIS LLC, Rockville, Maryland; Mikhael David

Appeal: 13-2426

Doc: 33

Filed: 05/09/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Charnoff, PERRY CHARNOFF PLLC, Arlington, Virginia; Christopher
Clayton Nolan, NOLAN, MROZ & MCCORMICK, Vienna, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-2426

Doc: 33

Filed: 05/09/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Sheri
dismissing,

Daniel

pursuant

appeals
to

the

Federal

district

Rule

of

court’s
Civil

order

Procedure

12(b)(6), her state-law claims of fraud, intentional infliction
of emotional distress, unjust enrichment, and quiet title.

She

also appeals the denial of her motion for leave to file a second
amended complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.
We

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3