John Woods v. The Boeing Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cv-02855-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999445587].. [13-2455]

Appeal: 13-2455

Doc: 50

Filed: 09/30/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2455

JOHN WOODS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE BOEING COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-02855-RMG)

Submitted:

September 26, 2014

Decided:

September 30, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald L. Gilliard, Joseph R. Hennell, THE LAW OFFICE OF GERALD
L. GILLIARD, ESQ., LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Cherie
W. Blackburn, Michael P. Scott, NEXSEN PRUET, LLC, Charleston,
South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2455

Doc: 50

Filed: 09/30/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John Woods appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to his former employer on his claims that the
employer failed to accommodate his disabilities and discharged
him in retaliation for requesting such accommodations, and he
appeals the order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.

We

have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and
find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.

we

affirm

for

the

Woods v. The Boeing Co.,

No. 2:11-cv-02855-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2013; Oct. 30, 2013).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2