John Strauch, Jr. v. Exelon Corporation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01543-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999332874].. [13-2464]

Appeal: 13-2464

Doc: 25

Filed: 04/09/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2464

JOHN J. STRAUCH, JR.; JASON ENDLICH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
EXELON CORPORATION; CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP'S SEVERANCE
PLAN,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-01543-JKB)

Submitted:

April 1, 2014

Decided:

April 9, 2014

Before SHEDD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher G. Mackaronis, BRICKFIELD, BURCHETTE, RITTS & STONE,
PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellants.
Azeez Hayne, MORGAN,
LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2464

Doc: 25

Filed: 04/09/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John J. Strauch, Jr., and Jason Endlich appeal the
district

court’s

order

granting

summary

judgment

to

Exelon

Corporation and Constellation Energy Group’s Severance Plan.
have

reviewed

memorandum

the

opinion

district court.

record
and

de

affirm

novo
for

and
the

the

district

reasons

We

court’s

stated

by

the

See Strauch v. Exelon, No. 1:13-cv-01543-JKB

(D. Md. Nov. 19, 2013).

We also conclude that the district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for
discovery.
788,

792

dispense

See Erdmann v. Preferred Research, Inc., 852 F.2d
(4th

Cir.

with

oral

contentions

are

1988)

(stating

argument

adequately

standard

because

presented

in

the
the

of

review).

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2