Eric Young v. Jodi Blatt
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999261257-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00089-FPS-JES. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999366833]. [13-2470]
Appeal: 13-2470
Doc: 12
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2470
ERIC J. YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JODI L.
TAYLOR,
BLATT;
KYLIE
M.
LONG;
CHELSEA
L.
LONG;
STEVEN
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00089-FPS-JES)
Submitted:
May 29, 2014
Decided:
June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric J. Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-2470
Doc: 12
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Eric
accepting
the
J.
Young
appeals
recommendation
the
of
district
the
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly,
we
deny
leave
to
proceed
in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.
Young v. Blatt, No. 5:13-cv-00089-FPS-JES
(N.D.W.
2013).
Va.
Nov.
6,
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?