Cheryl Cohens v. State of Maryland Department

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999276227-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-03419-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999339825]. Mailed to: Cohens. [13-2489]

Appeal: 13-2489

Doc: 13

Filed: 04/21/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2489

CHERYL F. COHENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES; BALTIMORE
CITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:11-cv-03419-WDQ)

Submitted:

April 17, 2014

Decided:

April 21, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl F. Cohens, Appellant Pro Se.
Elise Song Kurlander,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2489

Doc: 13

Filed: 04/21/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Cheryl F. Cohens seeks to appeal the district court’s
order finally disposing of all claims in her action alleging
employment discrimination.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of
the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

“[T]he timely

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.”

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket
on July 30, 2013.
11, 2013.

The notice of appeal was filed on December

Because Cohens failed to file a timely notice of

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal
period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
DISMISSED

2