James Lacoy v. IAC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999273290-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00273-MOC-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999339741]. Mailed to: Lacoy. [13-2507]

Appeal: 13-2507

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/21/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2507

JAMES ANDREW LACOY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
IAC,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00273-MOC-DCK)

Submitted:

April 17, 2014

Decided:

April 21, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Andrew Lacoy, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas J. Gibney, EASTMAN & SMITH,
Appellee.

William Patrick Bingle,
LTD, Toledo, Ohio, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2507

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/21/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James Andrew Lacoy appeals the district court’s order
adopting
relief

the
in

magistrate

his

employment

judge’s

recommendation

discrimination

and

action.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

denying
We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
v.

IAC,

No.

3:13-cv-00273-MOC-DCK

Lacoy’s

motion

for

dispense

with

oral

contentions

are

appointment
argument

adequately

(W.D.N.C.

of

counsel

because

presented

in

the
the

Nov.
is

15,

Lacoy
2013).

denied.

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2