Jerry Hurst v. Guy Harbert

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999264212-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00558-GBL-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999344704]. Mailed to: Jerry Hurst. [13-2524]

Appeal: 13-2524

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/28/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2524

JERRY A. HURST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GUY HARBERT, in his individual and official capacities;
MAXWELL WIEGARD, in his individual and official capacities;
MARTY
HARBIN, in his individual and official capacities;
COLIN SHALK, in his individual and official capacities;
NICHOLAS SKILES, in his individual and official capacities;
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00558-GBL-JFA)

Submitted:

April 24, 2014

Decided:

April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-2524

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/28/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jerry A. Hurst seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint,
and denying his motion for reconsideration.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court.

Hurst v. Harbert, No.

1:13-cv-00558-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2013 & Nov. 22, 2013).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2