Jerry Hurst v. Guy Harbert

Filing

AMENDING ORDER/OPINION filed [999380242] amending and superseding Unpublished per curiam Opinion [999379820-2] dated 6/20/2014. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00558-GBL-JFA Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Jerry A. Hurst. [13-2524]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-2524 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/20/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 FILED: June 20, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 13-2524 (1:13-cv-00558-GBL-JFA) ___________________ JERRY A. HURST Plaintiff – Appellant v. GUY HARBERT, in his individual and official capacities; MAXWELL WIEGARD, in his individual and official capacities; MARTY HARBIN, in his individual and official capacities; COLIN SHALK, in his individual and official capacities; NICHOLAS SKILES, in his individual and official capacities; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-10, Defendants - Appellees ___________________ O R D E R ___________________ The Court amends its opinion filed June 20, 2014, as follows: On page 1, the panel members are corrected to remove the name "DIAZ," and replace it with the name "SHEDD." For the Court--By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk Appeal: 13-2524 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/20/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 ON REHEARING UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2524 JERRY A. HURST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GUY HARBERT, in his individual and official capacities; MAXWELL WIEGARD, in his individual and official capacities; MARTY HARBIN, in his individual and official capacities; COLIN SHALK, in his individual and official capacities; NICHOLAS SKILES, in his individual and official capacities; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-10, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00558-GBL-JFA) Submitted: May 30, 2014 Decided: June 20, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 13-2524 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/20/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Jerry A. Hurst seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2721-2725 (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurst v. Harbert, No. 1:13-cv-00558-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2013 & Nov. 22, 2013). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?