US v. Phillip William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999297805].. [13-4615]

Appeal: 13-4615

Doc: 24

Filed: 02/18/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4615

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1)

Submitted:

January 30, 2014

Decided:

February 18, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell Warren Mace, III, THE MACE FIRM, Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina, for Appellant.
William N. Nettles, United States
Attorney, Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-4615

Doc: 24

Filed: 02/18/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

James

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Phillip

Williams

the

district

court’s

judgment in a criminal case pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act.
We

have

reviewed

Accordingly,

record

affirm

we

the

the

and

find

district

no

reversible

court’s

error.

judgment.

See

United States v. Williams, 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 16,
2013); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012); United States v.
Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286-87 (4th Cir. 2013); United States v.
Fraley, 988 F.2d 4, 6-7 (4th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. Crim. P. 35.
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2