In re: Under Seal

Filing 64

RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lavabit LLC and Ladar Levison in 13-4625, 13-4626 to to court inquiry [61],notice requesting response [61]. [13-4625, 13-4626] Jesse Binnall

10387 Main Street, Ste. 201
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
[phone]
[phone] (fax)

Jonathan R. Bronley, Partner
Jesse R. Binnall, Partner
January 10, 2014

Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1100 East Main Street, Suite 501
Richmond, VA 23219-3517
Re: 13-4625, In re: Under Seal
Dear Ms. Connor:
The Office of the Clerk requested our position on whether the courtroom
needed to be sealed during all or a portion of the presentation of oral argument
in the above-referenced matter. We agree with the United States’ position that
sealing the courtroom is unnecessary due to the District Court unsealing the
majority of the record below, and the parties will not need to present any
presently sealed information at oral argument.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Jesse R. Binnall
Jesse R .Binnall
LTG/alc