In re: Under Seal
Filing
64
RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lavabit LLC and Ladar Levison in 13-4625, 13-4626 to to court inquiry [61],notice requesting response [61]. [13-4625, 13-4626] Jesse Binnall
10387 Main Street, Ste. 201
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
(703) 229-0335
(703) 537-0780 (fax)
Jonathan R. Bronley, Partner
Jesse R. Binnall, Partner
January 10, 2014
Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1100 East Main Street, Suite 501
Richmond, VA 23219-3517
Re: 13-4625, In re: Under Seal
Dear Ms. Connor:
The Office of the Clerk requested our position on whether the courtroom
needed to be sealed during all or a portion of the presentation of oral argument
in the above-referenced matter. We agree with the United States’ position that
sealing the courtroom is unnecessary due to the District Court unsealing the
majority of the record below, and the parties will not need to present any
presently sealed information at oral argument.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Jesse R. Binnall
Jesse R .Binnall
LTG/alc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?