Thomas Tweh v. Robert Greene

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-02360-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999121592]. Mailed to: Thomas Tweh. [13-6002]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6002 Doc: 19 Filed: 06/04/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6002 THOMAS N. TWEH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT GREENE; CAPTAIN PAYNE; SERGEANT JEFFERS; SERGEANT TATE; DOCTOR DADGAR; ANTHONY STURGESS; DOCTOR DAVARIS; P.A. D. STANSBURY; DEPUTY SHERIFF GREEN; DEPUTY SHERIFF SANGCO; CORPORAL MUHAMMAD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02360-GLR) Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 4, 2013 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas N. Tweh, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Roger L. Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6002 Doc: 19 Filed: 06/04/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas N. Tweh seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may 28 exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). v. The order Tweh seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?