US v. Michael Rufu

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999083947]. Mailed to: Michael Rufus. [13-6006]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6006 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/10/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6006 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge. NIEMEYER, Decided: Circuit Judges, April 10, 2013 and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Beth Drake, William States Attorneys, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6006 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/10/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael order denying pursuant to 28 Alonza his Rufus motion U.S.C. appeals for § 1651 a writ (2006). record and find no reversible error. district court’s order. the of We district error have court’s coram nobis reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm the See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02- cr-00550-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?