US v. Andre Green

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:08-cr-00944-MBS-10. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999054475]. Mailed to: Andre Green. [13-6028]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6028 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/01/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6028 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ANDRE SHAWN GREEN, a/k/a Andre Greene, a/k/a Dre, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00944-MBS-10) Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Shawn Green, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D. Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6028 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/01/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Andre Shawn Green appeals the district court’s order denying Green’s sentence 18 U.S.C. reduction. Sentencing mandatory Act On (“FSA”) minimum term § 3582(c)(2) appeal, should to Green apply which he (2006) asserts to was motion for a that the the statutory originally sentenced lower Fair because his direct appeal was pending at the time the FSA became effective. However, as Green was sentenced prior to August 3, 2010, the effective date of the FSA, he is not entitled to application of the reduced penalties. See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248-49 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 132 S. Ct. 356 (2011) (FSA does not apply retroactively to cases pending on direct appeal where defendant was sentenced prior to effective date of the Act). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?