US v. Bernard Gadsden

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:04-cr-01018-DCN-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999046664]. Mailed to: B. Gadsden. [13-6040]

Appeal: 13-6040

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/20/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6040

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BERNARD MARLIN GADSDEN,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:04-cr-01018-DCN-1)

Submitted:

February 13, 2013

Decided:

February 20, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Marlin Gadsden, Appellant Pro Se.
Alston Calhoun
Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6040

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/20/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Bernard Marlin Gadsden seeks to appeal the district
court’s orders directing the Government to respond to Gadsden’s
motion for reduction of sentence and granting the Government an
extension.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292

(2006);

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
orders

The orders Gadsden seeks to appeal are neither final

nor

appealable

interlocutory

or

collateral

orders.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2