Irvin Jefferson Wilson v. William Byra
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999036059-2] Originating case number: 4:11-cv-02837-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999143767]. Mailed to: Irvin Jefferson Wilson. [13-6083]
Appeal: 13-6083
Doc: 14
Filed: 07/05/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6083
IRVIN JEFFERSON WILSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM
BYRAS,
Director
SCDC;
MONICA
Classification SCDC; B. LEWIS, Case Worker SCDC,
WALLACE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
C. THOMPSON, Grievanor Co-Ord SCDC,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(4:11-cv-02837-MGL)
Submitted:
May 23, 2013
Decided:
July 5, 2013
Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irvin Jefferson Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox,
II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Appeal: 13-6083
Doc: 14
Filed: 07/05/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 13-6083
Doc: 14
Filed: 07/05/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Irvin
Jefferson
Wilson
appeals
the
district
court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
summary judgment to the Defendants on Wilson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) action.
We have reviewed the record and find no due
process violation, and thus no reversible error.
Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
substantially
Jefferson
2013).
legal
before
v.
for
the
Byras,
reasons
No.
stated
by
the
4:11-cv-02837-MGL
district
(D.S.C.
court.
Jan. 14,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?