Irvin Jefferson Wilson v. William Byra

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999036059-2] Originating case number: 4:11-cv-02837-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999143767]. Mailed to: Irvin Jefferson Wilson. [13-6083]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6083 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/05/2013 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6083 IRVIN JEFFERSON WILSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WILLIAM BYRAS, Director SCDC; MONICA Classification SCDC; B. LEWIS, Case Worker SCDC, WALLACE, Defendants – Appellees, and C. THOMPSON, Grievanor Co-Ord SCDC, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:11-cv-02837-MGL) Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: July 5, 2013 Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irvin Jefferson Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 13-6083 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/05/2013 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 13-6083 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/05/2013 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Irvin Jefferson Wilson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant summary judgment to the Defendants on Wilson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no due process violation, and thus no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm substantially Jefferson 2013). legal before v. for the Byras, reasons No. stated by the 4:11-cv-02837-MGL district (D.S.C. court. Jan. 14, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?