Demar Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [999101217-2] Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03121-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999117480]. Mailed to: Demar Worrell. [13-6085]
Appeal: 13-6085
Doc: 12
Filed: 05/29/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6085
DEMAR WORRELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAYNE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; MOUNT OLIVE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; BRANSON VICKORY, III; MIKE RICKS; LT. TOMMY
BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03121-FL)
Submitted:
May 23, 2013
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
AGEE,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
May 29, 2013
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6085
Doc: 12
Filed: 05/29/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Demar
Worrell
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by
court.
the
district
Attorney’s
2012).
We
Office,
No.
Worrell
v.
Wayne
5:12-ct-03121-FL
County
(E.D.N.C.,
District
Dec.
6,
We deny as moot Worrell’s motion to expedite decision.
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?