Demar Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [999101217-2] Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03121-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999117480]. Mailed to: Demar Worrell. [13-6085]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6085 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/29/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6085 DEMAR WORRELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WAYNE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; MOUNT OLIVE POLICE DEPARTMENT; BRANSON VICKORY, III; MIKE RICKS; LT. TOMMY BROWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03121-FL) Submitted: May 23, 2013 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. AGEE, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 29, 2013 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6085 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/29/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Demar Worrell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by court. the district Attorney’s 2012). We Office, No. Worrell v. Wayne 5:12-ct-03121-FL County (E.D.N.C., District Dec. 6, We deny as moot Worrell’s motion to expedite decision. dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?