William Kemph v. W. F. Brown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:12-cv-00430-GEC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999123031]. Mailed to: Kemph. [13-6122]

Appeal: 13-6122

Doc: 11

Filed: 06/05/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6122

WILLIAM T. KEMPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
W. F. BROWN, Detective; TOWN OF VINTON,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:12-cv-00430-GEC)

Submitted:

May 30, 2013

Decided:

June 5, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Timothy Kemph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6122

Doc: 11

Filed: 06/05/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

Timothy

appeals

PER CURIAM:
William

Kemph

the

district

court’s

orders dismissing without prejudice as legally frivolous his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, ∗ see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(1),
1367(c) (2006), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Kemph v. Brown, No. 7:12-cv-00430-GEC (W.D. Va. Nov. 8,

2012; Jan. 4, 2013).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗

We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no
amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by
the district court.
See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

2