US v. Raymond Chestnut
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to seal [999075128-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999040728-2] Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999155306]. Mailed to: Chestnut. [13-6197]
Appeal: 13-6197
Doc: 17
Filed: 07/22/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6197
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1)
Submitted:
July 18, 2013
Decided: July 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;
Arthur
Bradley
Parham,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6197
Doc: 17
Filed: 07/22/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm.
Chestnut’s motions to seal and for appointment of counsel are
denied.
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?