US v. Raymond Chestnut

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to seal [999075128-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999040728-2] Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999155306]. Mailed to: Chestnut. [13-6197]

Appeal: 13-6197

Doc: 17

Filed: 07/22/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6197

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1)

Submitted:

July 18, 2013

Decided: July 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;
Arthur
Bradley
Parham,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6197

Doc: 17

Filed: 07/22/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm.

Chestnut’s motions to seal and for appointment of counsel are
denied.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2