Joseph Lee McFadden v. Jerry Gainey

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cv-01470-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999097980]. Mailed to: Joseph Lee McFadden. [13-6208]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6208 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/30/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6208 JOSEPH LEE MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JERRY GAINEY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:12-cv-01470-MGL) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: April 30, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Lee McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6208 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/30/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Lee McFadden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. McFadden v. Gainey, No. 4:12-cv-01470-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2013). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?