Joseph Lee McFadden v. Jerry Gainey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cv-01470-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999097980]. Mailed to: Joseph Lee McFadden. [13-6208]
Appeal: 13-6208
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/30/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6208
JOSEPH LEE MCFADDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JERRY GAINEY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(4:12-cv-01470-MGL)
Submitted:
April 25, 2013
Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.
WYNN,
Circuit
Decided: April 30, 2013
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Lee McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.
David Cornwell Holler,
LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6208
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/30/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Lee McFadden appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
We
have
Accordingly,
district
court.
McFadden v. Gainey, No. 4:12-cv-01470-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2013).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?