US v. David Zebrowski
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999117450]. Mailed to: David Zebrowski. [13-6257]
Appeal: 13-6257
Doc: 5
Filed: 05/29/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6257
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart,
Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith,
a/k/a
Lewis
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3)
Submitted:
May 23, 2013
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
AGEE,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
May 29, 2013
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,
Appellee.
Daniel Cooke,
Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6257
Doc: 5
Filed: 05/29/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David
Zebrowski
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) motion.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
(E.D.
United
Va.
Jan.
States
16,
v.
2013).
Zebrowski,
We
No.
dispense
3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?