Antonio Mosley v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Police

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999081954-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00070-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999117283]. Mailed to: Mosley. [13-6395]

Appeal: 13-6395

Doc: 12

Filed: 05/29/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6395

ANTONIO MOSLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG
POLICE
DEPARTMENT;
J.
REDFERM,
Detective; JIM AGETRICK, Detective; TAMMY CLARY, Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00070-RJC)

Submitted:

May 23, 2013

Before MOTZ * and
Circuit Judge.

AGEE,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

May 29, 2013

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Mosley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

Judge Motz did not participate in consideration of this
case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Appeal: 13-6395

Doc: 12

Filed: 05/29/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Antonio
dismissing

Mosley

without

appeals

prejudice

the

his

district

42

U.S.C.

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006).
the record and find no reversible error.
for

the

reasons

stated

Charlotte

Mecklenburg

(W.D.N.C.

Feb.

21,

by

the

Police
2013).

appointment of counsel.

We

deny

§ 1983

order
(2006)

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

district
Dep’t,

court’s

court.

No.

Mosley

v.

3:13-cv-00070-RJC

Mosley’s

motion

for

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2