Michael Perry v. SCDC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999081120-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999070978-2] Originating case number: 4:12-cv-01205-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999117469]. Mailed to: Michael Tyrone Perry. [13-6402]
Appeal: 13-6402
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/29/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6402
MICHAEL TYRONE PERRY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SCDC; LEE CI; A. J. PADULA, Warden; CAPTAIN RONNIE CRIBB;
SMU ADMINISTRATOR BRUCE OBERMAN; WILLIAM A. BYARS, Director
over SCDC; DOCTOR EDWARD STAHL; NURSE ADMINISTRATOR YVONNE
MCDONALD; IGC C JAMES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (4:12-cv-01205-RMG)
Submitted:
May 23, 2013
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
AGEE,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
May 29, 2013
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Tyrone Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6402
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/29/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael
Tyrone
Perry
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying
relief
on
his
42
denying reconsideration.
no reversible error.
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint
and
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Perry v. South Carolina Dep’t of
Corr., No. 4:12-cv-01205-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 25 & Mar. 14, 2013).
We also deny Perry’s motions to assign counsel.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?