Jeffery Porter v. Trevor Robinson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999082167-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999073391-2] Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00068-RGD-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999138104]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-6412]
Appeal: 13-6412
Doc: 15
Filed: 06/26/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6412
JEFFERY EDWARD PORTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TREVOR JARED ROBINSON, Attorney and Counselor at Law,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00068-RGD-LRL)
Submitted:
June 20, 2013
Decided:
June 26, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffery Edward Porter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6412
Doc: 15
Filed: 06/26/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
Edward
appeals
PER CURIAM:
Jeffery
Porter
the
district
court’s
order dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a
claim.
See
28
U.S.C.
confine
our
brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
does
not
disposition,
court’s
and
to
challenge
Porter
order.
judgment.
counsel
review
§ 1915A(b)(1)
We
to
the
the
has
issues
deny
amend
for
forfeited
Porter’s
his
raised
On
in
the
appeal,
we
Appellant’s
Because Porter’s informal brief
basis
Accordingly,
(2006).
we
the
district
appellate
affirm
the
motions
for
complaint.
We
review
district
the
court’s
of
the
court’s
appointment
dispense
with
of
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?