Arick Dail v. USDC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999077069-2] Originating case number: 5:12-hc-02181-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999159600]. Mailed to: Arick Dail. [13-6425]
Appeal: 13-6425
Doc: 10
Filed: 07/26/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6425
ARICK GRAHAM DAIL,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:12-hc-02181-D)
Submitted:
July 23, 2013
Decided:
July 26, 2013
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arick Graham Dail, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6425
Doc: 10
Filed: 07/26/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Arick
Graham
Dail,
a
federal
prisoner,
appeals
the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition.
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Dail v. United States
District Court, No. 5:12-hc-02181-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2013).
We
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?