Arick Dail v. USDC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999077069-2] Originating case number: 5:12-hc-02181-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999159600]. Mailed to: Arick Dail. [13-6425]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6425 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/26/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6425 ARICK GRAHAM DAIL, Petitioner – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:12-hc-02181-D) Submitted: July 23, 2013 Decided: July 26, 2013 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arick Graham Dail, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6425 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/26/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Arick Graham Dail, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dail v. United States District Court, No. 5:12-hc-02181-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?