Derek Curtis v. Kenneth Cuccinelli

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00296-CMH-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999156598]. Mailed to: Derek Curtis. [13-6437]

Appeal: 13-6437

Doc: 11

Filed: 07/23/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6437

DEREK CURTIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, Attorney General; PAUL EBERT,
Esquire, Commonwealth Attorney; JEANICE WEITHOP, Esq. Asst.
Commonwealth
Attorney;
ANGELA
HORAN,
County
Attorney;
COLONEL
MELETUS, Superintendent; CHERYL ANN WALTON, CAC;
CAPTAIN GEORGE HURLOCK, Director of Security; CHARLIE DEAN,
Chief of Police; HEATHER DARLING, Detective; SERGEANT
BREWER, Deputy Sheriff; OFFICER PEACEMAKER, Deputy Sheriff;
CAROLYN OLIVER, Social Worker II; SERGEANT LAUREL WHITAKER,
Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CHERYL WALTON, Attorney; UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICER,
Prince William County Regional Adult Detention Center;
BRANT, Correctional Officer; TED BODIE, Attorney,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00296-CMH-IDD)

Submitted:

July 18, 2013

Decided:

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

July 23, 2013

Appeal: 13-6437

Doc: 11

Filed: 07/23/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Curtis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-6437

Doc: 11

Filed: 07/23/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Derek

Curtis

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006).
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Curtis v. Cuccinelli, No. 1:12-cv-00296-

CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 19 & entered Feb. 21, 2013).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3