William Cash v. Doctor Thoma

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:12-cv-01278-DCN-KFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999138182]. Mailed to: William Cash. [13-6439]

Appeal: 13-6439

Doc: 18

Filed: 06/26/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6439

WILLIAM AUSTON CASH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOCTOR THOMAS; LIEUTENANT CLAWSON,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(6:12-cv-01278-DCN-KFM)

Submitted:

June 20, 2013

Decided:

June 26, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Auston Cash, Appellant Pro Se.
Erin Farrell Farthing,
MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina;
Justin Tyler Bagwell, William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON &
LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6439

Doc: 18

Filed: 06/26/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William Auston Cash appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Cash’s
request

for

injunctive

relief

in

the

form

of

a

court

order

directing his transfer to a federal medical facility for dental
evaluation and treatment.

On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).

See 4th Cir. R.

Because Cash’s informal brief does not challenge the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Cash has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2