Kenneth Rivera v. C. Long

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999082468-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999082463-2] Originating case number: 8:12-cv-00233-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999138088]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-6442]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6442 Doc: 18 Filed: 06/26/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6442 KENNETH RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth Syncere Rivera, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT C. LONG, of SIU, SCDC HQ; SERGEANT JAMIE BELUE; C. O. M. GOLLACH; SHEILA BOYD, BRCI Classification; WARDEN ROBERT STEVENSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:12-cv-00233-JMC) Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 26, 2013 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Rivera, Appellant Pro Se. Sheila M. Bias, Drew Hamilton Butler, Jocelyn Newman, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6442 Doc: 18 Filed: 06/26/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Rivera seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Mar. 6, 2013). Rivera v. Long, No. 8:12-cv-00233-JMC (D.S.C. We deny Rivera’s motions to appoint counsel and for a transcript at government expense, and we dispense with oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?