Kenneth Rivera v. C. Long
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999082468-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999082463-2] Originating case number: 8:12-cv-00233-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999138088]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-6442]
Appeal: 13-6442
Doc: 18
Filed: 06/26/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6442
KENNETH RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth Syncere Rivera,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT C. LONG, of SIU, SCDC HQ; SERGEANT JAMIE BELUE; C.
O. M. GOLLACH; SHEILA BOYD, BRCI Classification; WARDEN
ROBERT STEVENSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:12-cv-00233-JMC)
Submitted:
June 20, 2013
Decided:
June 26, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Rivera, Appellant Pro Se. Sheila M. Bias, Drew Hamilton
Butler, Jocelyn Newman, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6442
Doc: 18
Filed: 06/26/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Rivera seeks to appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Mar. 6, 2013).
Rivera v. Long, No. 8:12-cv-00233-JMC (D.S.C.
We deny Rivera’s motions to appoint counsel and
for a transcript at government expense, and we dispense with
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
contentions
are
before
this
and
court
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?