Stanley Linder v. Matthew Friedman
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-03051-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204408]. Mailed to: Linder. [13-6510]
Appeal: 13-6510
Doc: 15
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6510
STANLEY D. LINDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. MATTHEW J. FRIEDMAN, Assistant
ALLEN WILSON, Attorney General,
Attorney
General;
MR.
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-03051-RMG)
Submitted:
September 26, 2013
Decided:
September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley D. Linder, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6510
Doc: 15
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley D. Linder appeals the district court’s order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
RMG
(D.S.C.
Mar.
We have reviewed the record and find no
6,
Linder v. Friedman, No. 1:12-cv-03051-
2013).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?