Stanley Linder v. Matthew Friedman

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-03051-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204408]. Mailed to: Linder. [13-6510]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6510 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6510 STANLEY D. LINDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. MATTHEW J. FRIEDMAN, Assistant ALLEN WILSON, Attorney General, Attorney General; MR. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03051-RMG) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley D. Linder, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6510 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Stanley D. Linder appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. RMG (D.S.C. Mar. We have reviewed the record and find no 6, Linder v. Friedman, No. 1:12-cv-03051- 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?